When
I started viewing Zimabardo's
videos, I did see a tremendous difference between both of
them. At first, when I clicked play on the first one I saw the duration time
and I was like, here we a good long 40 minute video. It was interesting up to
the part where the study was conducted and he was reveling some of the evidence
found in the study. When he played the video he recorded, it was interesting
and caught my attention. Media within media. But as he started going off of his
PowerPoint presentation, it got quite a bit draining in a sense.
It
kind of made me want to test that theory (the time
paradox) on my kids. I see my oldest daughter as a present focus person.
She wasn’t everything to happen right away. She is not patient at all, and by
listening to his speech, it makes sense. I see my middle and youngest child as
future focus. They are divergent thinkers. They analyze everything before
making a decision. Both think outside the box and think of the future. They
both know what they want and will get if they just take a minute to analyze their
actions.
When
I saw the animated video, it made me more aware of what he was talking about.
By looking at the drawings, I realized that I had missed that part or not
completely understood what he was saying. To me the animation video made more
sense and kept me intrigued. Also the video explained the study to the point
and it was only 10 minutes. As Zimbardo
stated, most of us are digital learners, and with that said, by me knowing that
I enjoyed the animation presentation better says a lot.
No comments:
Post a Comment